Nuclear power is one thing*, but Frackin' with our water?
* not green(except for trickle up)
[What the frack is the connection to Newt Gingrich, well the paradox of green and being able to be a paradox period. His frackin' campaign seems to be burning the candle on both ends. But this is too complex for me to explain, except for the idea that he commits to Lean Six Sigma,*** but not to the concepts his staff thinks it will take to win. Is this a bringing it to the table moment ala the silver lining of the churned media cloud? It is bad enough that Republicans have enough money to run their lies in ads and Faux News, but they have enough to add cloud to the process.]
[Not to** mention lame stream media.]
** way
*** last frackin' link
[Post comments footnote(see my two comments): There is nothing wrong with Six Sigma as a tool, but it may be besides the point, but not aside from the point of whose hands it is in, and for what purpose it is wielded(people or profit). In fact, I believe that "Lean Six Sigma" violates "Six Sigma" principles by having a target of 25% spending reduction, which demonstrates my point on purposes and whose hands should wield it for what. Aside from the point: what the frack is the point of government?]
2 comments:
This is not as far fetched a twist of my Re:Verb missing snooze metaphor. It regards rhetorical geometrics(no pun), hinged** upon Lean Six Sigma, and the fancies(mystification*) of Gingrich and Palin.
[See bold "to", "media", "Lean Six Sigma" and "Frackin'" links.]
* search this blog "rubric"
** not exactly, but 4D tetrahedron
Note: Gingrich has signed a pledge to use or indeed take a course on Lean Six Sigma, while in the link I have inserted the Center for American Progress has referenced plain Six Sigma. The connection being, what the heck is the point of the management tool if it misses the point of government verse us[!] business?
Post a Comment